Intent Blog www.intentblog.com
IntentBlog is a blog started by Dr. Deepak Chopra and being authored by numerous moves and shakers of India. Its a wonderful blog to follow, each and every post in the blog is generating numerous discussions everyday.
Our goal with INTENT is to participate in the creation of a paradigm where the old values of militarism, ethnocentrism, nationalism, and cultural and economic imperialism will become obsolete. We feel that people from Asia and India, in a vast and spread out diaspora across the globe, are poised to emerge as the new leaders who will inspire, educate, entertain, and enlighten humanity to a new level of awareness and a new expression of its potential. We feel humbled at the privilege of being participants in this global mind change and we invite others who share our vision to join us in transforming the intent of INTENT into reality.
Posted by Ramdhan Yadav at August 29, 2005 11:42 AM Perma Link
DO NOT MAKE IODISED SALT COMPULSORY.
Dear Mallika,
what a fascinating website! I’m so glad Neelam mandal insisted / asked us to browse through it. We our waging a “War” against our Country’s “ Health” Ministry who seem hell bent on making iodised salt compulsory when the whole world is veering towards naturally grown/ organically grown edibles. Any suggestions from readers as to how we can , “ win this war”?
(And the letter follows here)
To
The Secretary,
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Nirman Bhavan,
New Delhi.
Re. Compulsory Iodisation of Salt.
Dear Sir,
We strongly object to the compulsory iodisation of salt.
1. It is our right as consumers to decide what kind of salt we wish to eat.
Nowhere is iodized salt mandatory – not in the USA, nor in UK, Austrialia, Switzerland, Mauritius, Turkey, etc.,etc.
As per draft Notification no GSR (340 E) the center is planning to ban the sale of all non-iodised salt in the country w.e.f 15.08.2005.
This is a move by the Health Dept. to fight iodine deficiency (which could cause cretinism) which they have observed in the sub-Himalayan region and which they say affects about 2% to 3% of the population.
If 2% to 3% are iodine deficient why should 96% to 97% of Indians be forced to eat iodized salt? Isn’t this measure akin to killing a fly with a sledge hammer?
2. As consumers it is our right to know which areas are iodine deficient, by how much and why? We need to see this proof printed in a recognized scientific journal before we are forced to consume potassium iodate. ( Pottasium Iodate is an expensive chemical imported at exhorbitant cost to the ex-chequer and not approved for iodisation of table salt in US, according to the Kirk Othmer Encyclopaedia. Infact Pottasium Iodate was labeled as “toxic, a poison” by the Ministry of Environment when the Ministry of Health first decided to introduce it in India more than a decade ago.
3. India is largely coastal and iodine is available naturally to all those living on the coast through the water, sea salt, fish, and even the AIR WE BREATHE!
Sea Salt (containing iodine in its natural form) was available till recently for .50 p to Re. 1 a kg. Then when iodised salt was made compulsory, major salt manufacturers stepped in and increased the price of compulsory iodised salt to Rs.7 - Rs 12 per kg. (And that when the cost of iodisation is only .2 paise per kg!)
It makes one wonder who is going to benefit by the compulsory iodisation policy. Not the common man … but salt manufacturers, procurers of the expensive potassium iodate and, ofcourse, those in the Govt keen on aiding and abetting them.
4. Endocrinologists say that before prescribing iodine to any patient the extent of his iodine deficiency in his system has to be determined.
Secondly, it is imperative to medically examine the urine of every one consuming iodine to ensure that excess iodine has been got rid off.
For excess iodine in the system can cause irreparable damage.
Does the Govt. have the infrastructure to monitor the amount of iodine deficiency in each individual? Does it have the infrastructure to monitor the urine of each individua.l to see that excess iodine is got rid off? Does it have the money to pay damages to all persons who will suffer from excess iodine in their systems?
Again, does it have the infrastructure to see that iodine is sprayed uniformly on all salt? In Gujarat unscrupulous salt companies are right now randomly spraying iodine on salt lying in the open & packaging this also in the open. There is absolutely no quality control!
5. Here’s what MARTINDALE, the Extra Pharmacopoea 27th Edition.
has to say about the damage excess iodine can cause to a persons system.
Toxic Effects of continued administration of iodine is known to lead to mental depression, nervousness, insomnia, sexual impotence, myxoedema and goiter. Hypersensitivity to iodine(Iodism) may occur actely or after prolonged adminstration and is characterised by coryza, headache, pain in the salivary glands, lachrymation, weakness, conjunctivitis, fever, laryngitis, bronchitis, and skin reactions including ioderma, erythema, acneform eruptions, urticaria, suppurative and haemorrhagic rashes. Vomitting metallic taste in the mouth, abdominal pain and diarrhoea are also known to occur. In extreme cases, death due to oedema of the glottis causing asphyxiation and pulmonary oedema are also recorded Iodides in breast milk are suspected to cause hypothyroidism or goiter in infants. Iodine given to the mother is also known to cause Thrombocytopenia which is hazardous to the foetus.
Iodised salt should carry a compulsory warning in red, bold letters that its usage may lead to allergies & thyrotoxicosis.
6. Experiments to make iodised salt compulsory were conducted in Holland and Tasmania. They were a flop & had to be discontinued. In Tasmania the incidence of Thyrotoxicosis in men increased by 8.3% ! England was also iodine deficient once upon a time. But instead of making iodised salt compulsory they embarked on a massive education program to educate the British to eat “right”. Today there is no iodine deficiency & iodised salt constitutes about 2.5% of the sale of all salt. Should we learn from these experiences or have the luxury of making our own blunders?
6. Indians are intelligent. They have made a mark in so many fields.
By depriving them of the CHOICE OF SALT they wish to eat you are equating them with cattle or morons not fit to make choices!
Why not, Like in the UK create an awareness that milling and polishing of rice and other grains removes their iodine content. Cereals, millets, pulses, leafy vegetables, roots and spices, nuts, fruits, milk and milk products, eggs, fish and even tap water contain iodine in its natural, absorbable form.
So basically, what you need to advocate is a healthy, balanced diet and clean drinking water as it is worms and drinking water polluted with animal and human excreta and water rich in calcium drawn from deep wells, can also cause iodine deficiency.
7. There are over 200 known trace elements in the body. Iodine is only one of them. Will the govt. next step be to introduce 200 trace elements in salt as well as anti-cholestrol agents as many Indians have heart problems?!!
In brief,
As Indians we demand our right to the choice of salt we wish to eat.
And if salt is iodised, iodisation must be properly monitored. A warning must be printed on each packet of the allergies & thyroid problems that could occur.
Even in iodine- deficient areas people should be given iodine with medical supervision & not by lay persons.
Yours sincerely,
KUMKUM SOMANI
Very lucidly spelt out by kumkum. We are in the process of a scientific and systematic review of the research on iodized salt. The findings point to major issues like: overstatement of magnitude of the problem due to methodological issues; lacunae in causal linkages by ignoring signifacant multi causality; flawed assesment of the impact of intervention i.e. iodized salt; and harmful effects of iodine not given due cognizance. The research till date has been a hegemony of one particular group and most of the research suffers from serious methodological flaws. To further compound the issue, many independent researchers, on finding something different from the existing dominant paradigm (iodized salt as panacea for goiter) have tended to ignore these in their final conclusions and recommendations! We forwarded our objections along with a 33 page copy of our review to the GOI in July 2005 but have yet to hear from them. Lets hope someone thinks of region based assessments of the problem and solutions.
hello friend
i m glad to find such a blog, thanks. we r agitating for the last so many years against the ban on non iodised salt.on 17th may we r going to violate the govt policy across the country on salt which will come into effect from the same date.
you can too join us.
hello friend
i m glad to find such a blog, thanks. we r agitating for the last so many years against the ban on non iodised salt.on 17th may we r going to violate the govt policy across the country on salt which will come into effect from the same date.
you can too join us.
hello friend
i m glad to find such a blog, thanks. we r agitating for the last so many years against the ban on non iodised salt.on 17th may we r going to violate the govt policy across the country on salt which will come into effect from the same date.
you can too join us.